Few people (in my view few, a few, very few with severe identity crisis) comes up with some innovative (destructive) concept utilising the GAP between the expectations and reality.
It is true whoever will work in a society will commit mistake. Moreover none is GOD, hence even after best possible trial, something may not be achieved.
I noticed recently whenever DCW-SDC plans some event this Club comes up with a opposite proposal, which never gets materialised, but waste considerable times.
In last General Meeting, Poddar (T-4) and Sujoy Sinha (T-7) announced they did so many miracles after negotiating with builder like:
1. Diagnostics Centre being open in 15 days (i.e. 15th August)
2. Lake will be up and running
3. Community Hall charge is reduced to 5,000/- before 1st August
and many more.
Some ladies were sitting in front rows just clapping everything announced and shouting at others whenever any common residents question or ask clarification.
We agree the present committee could do better job, but whether we should allow such parallel entities in our premises to fight with an elected committee?
When investigated later Sinha was never available and Poddar finally agreed that some announcements were not final and needs to follow up. Then another question who authorises these group to negotiate with builders on behalf of all residents? Otherwise is there any personal or group interest? Why things are announced spoiling a serious general meeting when those are baseless?
Finally when we knock every door to collect subscriptions, few of them offered part subscription or some claims themselves as deemed president / secretary of the Club and declined the subscription.
Dear well wisher, you comments are very true.
ReplyDeleteI can only say, my 2 year daughter often claims she is the president of my flat. Should we not tell it childish?